Ptrizia (tictac)

Features:  1) Asemic writing collage text

                   2) Palimpsest

                   3) A4 fine art paper

                   4) Elements of collage, ruberstamp

            

Ptrizia (tictac) wrote on the work Anecdote:

            I thought of my version of an anecdote, because it is a short story - a brief narrative within a broader discourse often contained in one paragraph and that demonstrates a point making the reader think deeply. The visual part is the 'broader discourse' underneath that expands  beyond the anecdote, the vintage brush of it giving a nostalgic flair, with a surreal mobile rubber stamp detail, to add the irony - I like to portray in my personal stories.



Comment: I knew in asking Patrizia for a work to demonstrate her understanding of vispro that I would receive a well thought out, quirky work which would reveal a truth more general than the brief tale from which it is drawn.  Patrizia (to me) produces quintessential visual poetry, but this work, as she states, is intended not to address the poetic of the term anecdote, but to visualise a common feature of literary work which involves subtle exaggeration and dramatic shape. In the words of Jürgen Hein, they exhibit "a special realism" and "a claimed historical dimension." (Quoted by David Gurteen  https://conversational-leadership.net/tag/anecdotes/

The word anecdote  was apparently coined by Procopius, the principal Byzantine historian of the 6th century, in a work titled Secret Society. Procopius is commonly classified as the last major historian of the ancient Western world, with  Secret Society being a collection of short incidents from the private life of the Byzantine court. One can see the visual element of a ‘peeper’ in this work, a chronicler who watches without being noticed, but who is surreptitiously recording all the untold secrets of those who think they are beyond the realms of ‘reality attending to reality’ – they who make use of innuendoes and subtle talk, those who deny and scratch out their words and re-say them – depending on the audience. The hint of a page number tells us that perhaps this a is part of a series of anecdotes. As an anecdote is a mini-story, this piece is also visually  structured as a ‘mini-story’ with the image in pocket, adding to the intended mystery and amusement. 

 


I got the blues:

 

Patrizia sees  “prose structure as fluent language with no stanzas but paragraphs that form rectangular shapes on paper. Every one of these paragraphs contains elements of the subject as supposedly prose does - being narrative after all.  The visual part are the elements is the blue of collage as the subject and I chose Asemics as the universal language that allows me to write the story and you to interpret it. My story is your story. Poetry can be perceived to be about the poet's feelings, and sometimes you have to read it few        times to understand and still may then not necessarily connect with him/her, as it is all about personal journey. Prose is easier to read, and it is informative, narrational and not necessarily as creative as poetry. It is intended to be more informative on a subject (whether you like the authors writing style or not). Maybe be I am simplistic, or minimalist but I go mostly by artistic intuition and shapes I see.

I am not a writer, so I lack of the understanding of literary tools and devices and as an artist I am more comfortable with the visual part which is more the shape than the narrative. I wonder what the differences of interpretations between artists, writers, and artist who-are-also-writers would be (on prose), whether on canvas or paper - and what it is they would concentrate on more (when tackling various literary devices).

Comment: I think Patrizia asks an important question here – what do artists/writers concentrate on/interpret whilst engaging in artistic practice? How do they situate the text on a page – and why do they choose to do it like that? What was the intent – to be poetic or to create an effect of prose? Are these two methodologies different at all? I would definitely think so.  Shape is also important in distinguishing between the poetic intention and the prose-ic intention I would venture. Think of concrete poetry, the ‘father’ of visual poetry – shape was a powerful determiner in categorization. True to the rectangular prose form, a simple colour element guides the reader to the intention of the writer-artists – I got the blues. ‘Blues’. We know can refer to music or an agitated, depressed state of mind. Interestingly the term is thought to have derived from a 17th century English expression referring to ‘the blue devils’ – intense visual hallucinations accompanying severe alcohol withdrawal https://www.huffpost.com/entry/blues-music-history_b_2399330 - there was very little that was poetic about that!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cheryl Penn - A vispro journey.

Visual Prose

A vispro and vispo experiment